Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Cashman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 26, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, S.
By her last witness in this will contest, the contestant offered the testimony of the decedent’s attending physician. A number of questions were asked and answered without objection as to the qualification of the witness and the fact that he had been the decedent’s attending physician. These questions and answers were proper for they merely showed the status of the witness. *882(Hampton v. Boylan, 46 Hun, 151; Martin v. Platt, 51 id. 429; Matter of Carter, 122 Misc. 493; Entian v. Provident Mutual Life Ins. Co., 155 id. 227; Klein v. Prudential Ins. Co., 221 N. Y. 449.)
After this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grattan v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Edington v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Edington v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Klein v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Thomas E. BreiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Mayorga v. TateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Stiles v. Clifton Springs Sanitarium Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- In re the Probate of Will of ClevelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.