Legal Opinion

Burnette v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1989No. 77428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

Appellee-plaintiff is an attorney. Appellant-defendant, who had suffered personal injuries as the result of a traffic incident, engaged appellee as his legal representative. The parties entered into a contingency fee contract which provided, in relevant part, that appellee would receive, as compensation for his services in appellant’s behalf, 40 percent of “the gross recovery.” Through appellee’s efforts, appellant did secure $2,500 in PIP benefits. Appellee thereafter continued to negotiate for a settlement of appellant’s other personal injury claims. However, he was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Georgia Society of Plastic Surgeons, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. Chester v. Georgia Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Overman v. All Cities Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Brookhaven Supply Co. v. RaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Bearden v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sosebee v. McCrimmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Yetman v. Gilbert Corp. of DelawareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Peoples v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Morrow v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Bell v. ForsterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API