Kaiser v. Flaccus
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OF -ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 123 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 485 December Term 1887, C. P. No. 1. On November 7, 1887, a summons in trespass was served in an action brought by Albert Kaiser against Charles L. Flaccus, to recover damages for personal injuries received. Issue.
Read the full summary
APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 1 OF -ALLEGHENY COUNTY. No. 123 October Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 485 December Term 1887, C. P. No. 1. On November 7, 1887, a summons in trespass was served in an action brought by Albert Kaiser against Charles L. Flaccus, to recover damages for personal injuries received. Issue. At the trial on April 20, 1890, it was shown that on February 21, 1887, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant, a manufacturer of bottles at Tarentum. His duty was the grinding of bottle necks. The machine at which he was employed consisted…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam :
The first assignment of error was practically abandoned npon the argument, and we fail to find error in the answer of the learned judge to the defendant’s tenth point. It is true, the affirmance was qualified, but we think the qualification justified by the circumstances of the case. It does not need discussion.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Weinschenk v. Philadelphia Home Made Bread Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Wallace v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- O'Rourke v. Alphons Custodis Chimney Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Whitley v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906