Legal Opinion
Vandevander v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1949No. 12339PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
A libel of information for forfeiture under Internal Revenue Code, § 3321, 26 U.S. C.A. § 3321, was filed against a seized automobile. It alleged that the automobile had on March 7, 1947, and on April 28, 1947, been used in the removal, deposit and concealment of whisky on which a tax was imposed but was unpaid, “with intent and for the purpose of defrauding the United States” of the tax. Appellant Vandevander claimed the automobile and denied it was so used with that intent and purpose, and demanded a jury trial. A jury was empanelled and evidence heard, whereupon each…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- The SarahSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Busic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. WinchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. One Kissel Touring AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Mildred AUSTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Ochoteco v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- United States v. One 1950 Lincoln Sedan, Motor No. 50lp 14278lCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. One 1953 Oldsmobile Sedan, Motor No. R376229, Serial No. 539A5536District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.