Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vandegrift v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 7, 1946No. 4537Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Bland, Judge:

It must be remembered that the rates of duty provided in the trade agreement with Czechoslovakia were terminated on the thirtieth day after the date of the proclamation. The thirtieth day began the instant the twenty-ninth day expired. It is well settled that there is to be no division of a day in the consideration of this kind of issue. Therefore the rates of duty were terminated on the beginning of the thirtieth day, just as tariff acts go into effect for the whole day on the date the President approves the act.

The statement in the majority opinion, “We are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. The Ship Richmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  3. The St. Lawrence, Webb, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  4. D. & C. Schwartz, Inc. v. De JongAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API