Handrow v. Cox
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentMiller, Judge
I dissent because I believe the trial court erred in refusing the Handrows’ tendered instructions Nos. 35 and 36.1
In reviewing the refusal to give tendered instructions this court considers the following: (1) whether the tendered instruction is a correct statement of the law; (2) whether the instruction is supported by the evidence; (3) whether the substance of the instruction is covered by other instructions; and (4) whether the refusal to give the instruction resulted in prejudice to the party who tendered it. City of Lake Station v. Rogers (1986), Ind.App., 500 N.E.2d 235, 240.
Handrows’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- State, Ind. State Highway Com'n v. SpeidelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lindley v. SinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Leuck v. GoetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Vance v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.