Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga St. Louis Ry. v. Beard

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1917Published

Appeal from Gadsden City Court. Heard before Hon. JOHN H. DlSQUE. Action by C. P. Beard against the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, for damages for overflowing land. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.(1) The case was submitted to the jury on the eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh counts of the complaint as amended. The averments of the eighth, ninth, and tenth counts are to the effect that the defendant collected waters in an artificial channel — a ditch — thereby diverting its natural flow, and conveyed it into the creek flowing through or near to the plaintiff’s land in such volume as to overtax the natural capacity of the creek, thereby proximately causing the water to flow over the plaintiff’s land, washing the soil and making deposits thereon that impaired or destroyed the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Savannah, Americus & Montgomery Railway v. BufordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Arndt v. City of CullmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Alabama Western Railroad v. WilsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API