Legal Opinion

People v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1997No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress a statement made by defendant to the police. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the statement was neither obtained in violation of defendant’s right to counsel (see, People v Bing, 76 NY2d 331, 349) nor induced by improper promises (see, CPL 60.45 [2] [b] [i]). We further conclude that the statement was voluntary.

The court’s instruction to the jury with respect to the voluntariness of defendant’s statement was an accurate statement of the fundamental legal principles and does not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. FuggazzattoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. SpannNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API