Legal Opinion

Oil Capital Racing Ass'n v. Tulsa Speedway, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 7, 1981No. 54499PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Judge.

The question is whether the facts pleaded by plaintiffs, Oil Capital Racing Association, Inc., and certain of its members, permit the legal conclusion that they have an enforceable third party beneficial interest in a written contract between defendant Hugh Finnerty Enterprises, Inc., 1 and Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust Authority. We hold that those plaintiffs who are stock car drivers 2 do and reverse the dismissal order.

I

According to plaintiffs’ petition this controversy arose when Speedway, the race track promoter, refused to pay plaintiffs a percentage of certain race…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barbero v. Equitable General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Technicable Video Sys. v. AmericableDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Copeland v. Admiral Pest Control Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. In Re Gulf Oil/Cities Service Tender Offer Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. Campbell v. American International Group, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API