Legal Opinion

In Re O'Daniell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1913No. A-1340PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of habeas corpus discloses the fact that petitioner is confined in the county jail of Jackson county under and by virtue of two separate commitments issued on two separate judgments rendered in the county court of said county against him for violations of the prohibitory law. The petitioner avers that his imprisonment is_ illegal in that the two sentences as a matter of law run concurrently, not being made cumulative by the judgment of the court, and petitioner having been confined a sufficient length of time to thus execute and satisfy both sentences is therefore…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HalbertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Ex Parte GriffenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API