Legal Opinion

Jinkner v. Town & Country Lanes, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1968No. Docket 1,388, 1,389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiffs John and Geraldine Jinkner, doing business as Permo-Plastics, a company engaged in the manufacturing, resurfacing and refinishing of bowling pins, appeal from a judgment of no cause of action. Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to in the singular as Jinkner) seek to recover $508.50 from Town & Country Lanes, Inc., and $603 from Rose Bowl Lanes, Inc., for services rendered in refinishing bowling pins. The defendants admitted the amounts claimed were the agreed price for the refinishing work, but they asserted the work had been done improperly.

Mr. Jinkner testified that the objective…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crabb v. Swindler, AdministratrixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. K & G CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Bellman Heating Co. v. HollandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Friedlander v. GrossNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Muskegon v. DeVriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Curbelo v. MacOmb County Community College TrusteesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Holloway Citizens Committee v. Genesee CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Joseph Staszak (81-1476) and Richard Staszak (81-1462) v. Walter RomanikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API