Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Fairchild v. Hizer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

It is undisputed that defendant subscribed for stock in the Wisconsin Canned Food Company in the sum of $1,000. If this subscription was made with the agreement, and understanding that it should not.be binding unless sufficient subscriptions to the stock to aggregate $86,000, together with the $50,000 raised upon the guaranty note of the company, were made, then the subscription was a conditional one and not binding unless it appears that the required amount was subscribed. Hodge v. Smith, 130 Wis. 326, 110 N. W. 192. The principally contested issue upon the trial was whether the requisite…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hodge v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Milwaukee Brick & Cement Co. v. SchoknechtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Derbeck v. AlbrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gibbons v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Milwaukee Smelting & Refining Co. v. LindenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Tri-State Home Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Marshall v. WittigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Coleman Hotel Co. v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Anderson v. Tri-State Home Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API