Legal Opinion

State v. Swinson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1992No. CR-90-1357Published

1Opinion of the Court

MONTIEL, Judge.

This is an appeal by the State of the trial court’s order dismissing this cause for lack of a speedy trial. Applying the four-pronged test of Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), we find it clear that Swinson was denied his right to a speedy trial. The Barker test looks at the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, the assertion of the right, and the prejudice resulting from the delay.

Length of Delay

There was a 26-month delay between the date Swinson was arrested (March 28, 1989) and the date on which his speedy trial motion was heard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Terry Kent Ringstaff v. Dale Howard and the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Don SiegelmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API