Legal Opinion

Lipscomb v. Blanz

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellants are property owners in Street Improvement District No. 350 of the city of Little Rock, and they seek by this suit to enjoin further proceedings looking to the construction of the proposed improvement. There are various grounds of attack, among others that a majority in value of the property owners did not petition for the construction of the improvement. As we think the appellants aré correct in this contention, we do not consider the other grounds of attack, for the one sustained is fatal to the district.

The court below sustained the organization of the district, but found that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. Forrest City Special Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hargis v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. DeBauche v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API