Legal Opinion
Barker v. Menominee Nation Casino
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 26, 1995No. 94-C-772PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Before the Court are the plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel and the defendants’ Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (2), and (6) in the above-captioned matter. For the following reasons, the plaintiffs motion is denied, the defendants’ motions are granted, and this ease is hereby dismissed.
On July 12, 1994, plaintiff Edward E. Barker filed the instant Complaint, in which he claims that defendants Menominee Nation Casino (“the Casino”), Menominee Tribal Gaming Commission (“the Commission”), and Menominee…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pink v. Modoc Indian Health Project, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Gavle v. Little Six, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Trudgeon v. Fantasy Springs CasinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Turning Stone Casino v. Vianese (In Re Vianese)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. StovallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.