McDougald v. Brunsman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Jerone McDougald, for a writ of habeas corpus. His claims are not cognizable in habeas corpus. See Pishok v. Kelly, 122 Ohio St.3d 292, 2009-Ohio-3452, 910 N.E.2d 1033 (validity or sufficiency of charging instrument); Junius v. Eberlin, 122 Ohio St.3d 53, 2009-Ohio-2383, 907 N.E.2d 1179 (actual innocence); Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio-1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067, ¶ 15 (fraud upon the court, prosecutorial misconduct, and perjured testimony).
Judgment affirmed.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keith v. BobbyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Junius v. EberlinOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Pishok v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009