Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1953No. 34629PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

The surety bond, by virtue of which the plaintiffs seek to hold Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company liable in count 1 of the petition, under the theory that the bond is a statutory one, is the identical bond which was under discussion by this court in Hopkins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 87 Ga. App. 513 (74 S. E. 2d 494). In that case this court held: “A real estate broker’s license bond, given pursuant tq the provisions of Code § 84-1409, as amended by the acts of 1949 (Ga. L. 1949, pp. 943, 945) and of 1950 (Ga. L. 1950, pp. 278/279), is purely a statutory bond, conditioned that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Crawford v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  3. Wall v. MountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Alexander v. IsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Stephens v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lord v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Royce Lord v. Clayton LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API