Legal Opinion

Silver v. Riegelmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1919Published

1Opinion of the Court

It is not necessary to decide whether city officials who have refused a building permit could in any circumstances be enjoined in equity from interference with a projected building. (People ex rel. Namm v. Carlin, 182 App. Div. 626.) Here the complaint was based on the Special Term order of May twenty-ninth, granting a peremptory mandamus to the superintendent of buildings, directing him to issue such a permit. But on the face of this complaint it appeared that by an appeal under section 1314 of the Code of Civil Procedure, such order had been stayed and superseded. To sue for an injunction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Namm v. CarlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API