Legal Opinion

Tolk v. Weinsten

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 4, 1975No. 20122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

The respondents instituted this action to recover certain textile machinery. This appeal is from an order denying appellants an extension of time in which to answer and finding the machinery to be the property of respondents. We reverse.

The question at issue concerns the effect of restraining orders issued by a bankruptcy court in New York in a state action instituted by respondents to recover the machinery.

The record reveals that respondents delivered certain textile machinery to appellants on or about June, 1969. Respondents commenced this action by service of a Summons and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Edwards v. FergusonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jonesboro Investment Trust Ass'n v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. BeckerNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bell v. Forrest Paschal Machinery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API