Rodgers v. Rodgers
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from the denial of a Rule 60 (b)(6), A.R.Civ.P. motion for relief from an order of divorce.
The trial court has wide discretion in its determination of whether to grant relief pursuant to Rule 60 (b), A.R.Civ.P., and its ruling will not be reversed except for an abuse of that discretion. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc. v. Edwards,374 So.2d 900 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). Relief is justified under a Rule (60)(b) motion when a party is able to show exceptional circumstances sufficient to entitle him to relief. HartfordInsurance Co. v. Lagano, 394 So.2d 933 (Ala. 1981). In reviewing a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Charles Townsend Ford, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Hartford Insurance v. LaganoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dobbins v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Bradford v. BradfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Mashatt v. MashattCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Snooky Hairrell Volkswagen, Inc. v. SpeerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.