Legal Opinion

Southern Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 6, 1956No. 4 Div. 880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The questions sought to be presented on this appeal are not raised by assignments of error as required by Supreme Court Rule No. 1, Code of 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix. The result is that the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Tidwell v. Town of Town Creek, 264 Ala. 330, 87 So.2d 646; Purvis v. Ennis, 258 Ala. 174, 61 So.2d 451; Wetzel v. Hobbs, 249 Ala. 434, 31 So.2d 639.

Affirmed.

GOODWYN, MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Purvis v. EnnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Tidwell v. Town of Town CreekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westbrook v. GibbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Howard v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Erwin v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Randolph v. GreasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Hambrick v. HambrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API