Legal Opinion

Nettleton v. Higginson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1977No. 11935Published

1Opinion of the Court

558 P.2d 1048 (1977)

98 Idaho 87

J.H. NETTLETON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

R. Keith HIGGINSON, as Director of the Dept. of Water Administration of the State of Idaho, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 11935.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

January 12, 1977.

Herbert W. Rettig, of Dunlap, Rettig & Rosenberry, Caldwell, William F. Schroeder, of Schroeder, Denning & Hutchens, Vale, Ore., for plaintiff-appellant.

Nathan W. Higer, Legal Counsel, Boise, for defendant-respondent.

DONALDSON, Justice.

This controversy involves a dispute between plaintiff-appellant J.H. Nettleton, a water user located in the Upper Reynolds Creek…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API