Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 21, 1992No. 23770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance proceeding, respondent admits that he has committed ethical violations and consents to disbarment. We accept respondent’s admission and disbar him. The facts surrounding the matter are as follows:

General Financial Irregularities

Respondent admits that he has failed to maintain the identity of client funds and has commingled these funds with his own personal funds. He has failed to maintain the integrity of his law firm’s trust and checking accounts, and has converted client funds from the trust account to his own personal use or to the use of others. Although he…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estrada v. WitkowskiDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1993
  2. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. In re GibbsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. In re WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API