Fryszka v. Prybeski
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Assumpsit by Stanley Fryszka against William V. Prybeski for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This case was tried by a referee, who reported his findings of facts and conclusions of law. It appears from those findings that defendant owed plaintiff a balance on an account -between them which, together with interest, amounted to $744.63; that there was due defendant for rent of a building occupied by a partnership composed of plaintiff and one Richard Champagne $648. This, with interest thereon at the date of the referee’s report, amounted %to $793.18. Defendant claimed in the court below, and claims in this court, that plaintiff was *462responsible for this rent, and that he was entitled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Doty v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Williams v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Brooks v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888