Legal Opinion

In re Noble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 22, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department moves to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b).

Respondent was admitted to practice in the First Department on February 25, 1974 and the misconduct alleged herein took place while respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within this department.

On June 1, 1984, respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a jury trial, of conspiracy to possess and distribute heroin and cocaine (21 USC…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API