Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Iserman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1982No. Docket 56065PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. F. Cavanagh, P.J.

Plaintiffs sued the defendants, alleging that the defendants’ proposed use of property in their subdivision violated an . amended deed restriction which prohibited the use of any subdivision lots for a state-licensed group residential facility, as that term is defined in MCL 125.216a; MSA 5.2961(16a), and MCL 125.583b; MSA 5.2933(2). The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that the amended deed restriction discriminates against mentally impaired persons and thereby violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs appealed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Skutt v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bellarmine Hills Ass'n v. Residential Systems Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Livonia v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Brier Lake, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. Craig v. BossenberyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. TenhoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API