Legal Opinion

People v. Willis

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Demureeb to an indictment for conspiracy.

1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.

The defendants, indicted for conspiracy, have demurred to the indictment. A previous motion to set aside’the indictment was denied by Mr. Justice ¡Van- Wyck. People v. Willis, 23 Misc. Rep. 568. The points then raised were (1) that the grand jury received and acted on illegal evidence; (2) that there was not sufficient evidence before the grand jury; (3) that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations, and (4) that the defendant Willis was compelled to testify against himself before the grand jury.

The objections to the indictment raised by demurrer are (1) that it does not conform…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TavorminaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. People v. TrammellNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. Rathbun, New York County Courts1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API