Brownell v. Salem Flouring Mills Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Marion County. Action by S. S. Brownell against the Salem Flouring Mills Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Respondent now moves to dismiss the appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
1. This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the judgment sought to be reviewed was given for want of an answer. A motion to strike out parts of the complaint was *526denied, and, the defendant declining further to plead, judgment was rendered against it for the sum demanded, from which an appeal was attempted to be taken. The statute, prescribing an appealable decision of a court, contains the following provision:
“Any party to a judgment or decree other than a judgment or decree given by confession, or for want of an answer,' may appeal therefrom:” B. & C. Comp. § 548.
Any pleading…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Willis v. MarksOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Thomas v. HerrallOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Krewson v. PurdomOregon Supreme Court · 1884
- Kearns v. FollansbyOregon Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Colwell v. ChernabaeffOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Multnomah County v. FalingOregon Supreme Court · 1909