Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boulet v. Brunswick Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1983No. Docket 61773Published

1DissentT. M. Burns, P.J.

Football is a governmental activity? Were defendants Kaye and Anderson making a governmental decision when they decided to send plaintiff David Boulet into a junior varsity high school football game? Does Detroit Lions head coach Monte Clark make a quasi-governmental decision when he decides to put a reserve into a game? For some reason that I *245cannot fathom, the majority in this case along with the majority in Churilla v East Detroit School Dist, 105 Mich App 32; 306 NW2d 381 (1981), and the panel in Grames v King, 123 Mich App 573; 332 NW2d 615 (1983),1 seem to think so. Because it stretches…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bush v. Oscoda Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Parker v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McCann v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gaston v. BeckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Everhart v. Board of Education of Roseville Community SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API