Legal Opinion

Ganias v. Arbella Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 11, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRutberg, J.

This matter comes to us as a result of the allowance of defendant/ appellee insurance company’s motion for summary judgment in plaintiff/appellant’s action for Personal Injury Protection [“PIP”] benefits under appellant’s policy of insurance issued by appellee. This appeal also allows us to comment upon the apparent conflict which may exist in two previous Appellate Division cases: Hodnett v. Arbella Mutual Insurance Company, 1996 Mass. App. Div. 131 [Northern District]; and Iaconi-Young v. Arbella Mutual Insurance Company, 1998 Mass. App. Div. 63 [Western District].

The facts are largely…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hodnett v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Iaconi-Young v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chiropractic Health Care Centers v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  2. Action Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Ganias v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Montanez v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API