Legal Opinion

Garrell v. . Columbus County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Are plaintiffs barred of right to maintain this action? This is tbe decisive question, controlled and answered by tbe decisions of tbis Court in tbe cases of Kirby v. Comrs., 198 N. C., 440, 152 S. E., 165, and Jones v. Alamance County, 212 N. C., 603, 194 S. E., 109.

No constitutional- question is involved on tbis appeal, as was tbe case in Sessions v. Columbus County, 214 N. C., 634, 200 S. E., 418. Here tbe question relates to statutory law. While tbe plaintiffs, by tbe allegation in tbe complaint, direct their attack against tbe validity of tbe order of election and tbe election, tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sessions v. . Columbus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Kirby v. . Commissioners of PersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Jones v. . Alamance CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Jones v. Alamance CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API