Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Flink

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1970No. B-1732PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Justice.

The application for writ of error in this condemnation case was granted to review the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals, 443 S.W.2d 397, which extended an exception to the hearsay rule announced in our Oakley decision discussed below. Because of this erroneous extension of the Oakley rule, this cause is reversed and is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

The particular condemnation arose out of the acquisition by the City of Austin of property belonging to the Flinks for its Decker Lake project. The parties stipulate that the only matter to be determined in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. OakleyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. City of Austin v. FlinkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. Danforth v. Reader's Digest Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Bottinelli v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. City of Houston v. WisnoskiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. State v. Tellepsen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Bradfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API