Legal Opinion

Vallejo v. Fay

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, County of Alameda. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.

Ejectment to recover possession of a large tract of land, on which the defendant is alleged to have entered without title. The case was submitted to the Court, the defendant not appearing. The Court finds the plaintiff has title in himself to the whole tract, and that defendant is in possession of sixty or seventy acres, without any showing of right. Judgment is entered on this finding for possession of the whole tract, and of this the defendant complains, and now assigns it as error.

We see no error of which defendant can complain. Ho damages are…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jennett v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Camarillo v. FenlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Lick v. StockdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API