Legal Opinion
Archuleta v. Hopper
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 8, 2014No. 2013-3177PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Katherine Archuleta, Director of the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”), petitions for review of a final order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) holding that an individual who meets the definition of an “employee” un der 5 U.S.C. § 7511(a)(1) has a statutory right to appeal his OPM-directed suitability removal as an adverse action under 5 U.S.C. chapter 75, subehapter II. Hopper v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 118 M.S.P.R. 608 (2012), aff'g Hopper v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., No. CH-0731-09-0798-I-3, 2012 MSPB LEXIS 1353 (Initial Decision, Mar. 8, 2012).…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raymond Express International, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Archuleta v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Archuleta v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Renu B. Lal v. Department of Health and Human Services, Merit Systems Protection Board2015
- United States v. PearceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019