Legal Opinion

Poulson v. Walsh-Groves

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1975No. 12718PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of a prime contractor. Plaintiff, a workman employed by a subcontractor, was injured in a work train collision near Trego, Montana. The train was operated by an employee of the prime contractor. The subcontract agreement required the subcontractor to maintain workmen’s compensation coverage. Subsequent to the accident plaintiff made claim for workmen’s compensation benefits, which he received.

Two issues are raised on appeal:(1) Does the “statutory employer” concept of section 92-438, R.C.M.1947, violate the equal protection clauses of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hammond v. HagerMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ashcraft v. Montana Power CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. OlsenMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Fiscus v. Beartooth ElectricMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Buerkle v. Montana Power CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Piper v. Lockwood Water Users Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Webb v. Montana Masonry Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Poulson v. Walsh-GrovesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Webb v. Montana Masonry Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API