Northcutt v. Northcutt
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
*102On Rehearing
STAKELY, Justice.
On application for rehearing it is very earnestly insisted that we have overlooked some important considerations in the original opinion. Our statement that the attack in this case is collateral is assailed, the position of the appellant being that the attack is direct. Appellant’s position is not correct. The attack in this case on the portion of the decree providing for permanent alimony was made long after the court had lost jurisdiction over its decree. There is no ’ allegation, however, that the decree was founded on fraud, accident or mistake. In Johnson v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Friedman & Loveman v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Constantine v. ConstantineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.