Legal Opinion

Linda Kesting v. James Kesting

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2016No. 42875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Linda Resting (“Linda”), obtained a judgment against Respondent, James Resting (“James”), for breach of an alimony/spousal support agreement entered into during their divorce. When that judgment was returned without recovery, the magistrate judge issued a Judgment of Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”). The subsequent judgment was intended to allow recovery of the unpaid spousal support and associated attorney fees from James’ pension plan. James appealed to the district court, which reversed. The district court concluded that the QDRO was not valid…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rohrbeck v. RohrbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  3. Shirley W. Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Company Profit Sharing Plan, Thomas A. Carpenter, Thorpe Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Arthur C. Hawkins v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Glenda R. Hawkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Burns v. BaldwinIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bart Dalton v. Carol DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Bart Dalton v. Carol DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. John Doe I and Jane Doe I v. John DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API