Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Philadelphia v. Lerner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2016No. 26 EAP 2015Published

1DissentChief Justice Saylor

I join Justice Donohue’s dissenting opinion. To the degree that the majority premises its disposition upon the doctrine of waiver, I offer the following comments.

When addressing concerns about issue preservation and presentation, my own thoughts align with those courts which remain “mindful of the prophylactic and prudential origins of the doctrine.” Huber v. Taylor, 469 F.3d 67, 75 (3d Cir. 2006). For example, in the federal judicial system, the doctrine of plain error, as well as discretionary decision-making authority invested *1026in the-courts of appeals, continue to serve as safety valves to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API