Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Arkansas Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 2, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The circnit court was right in directing a verdict for the defendant. The case is controlled by the principles of law. announced in St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Boyle, 83 Ark. 302, 103 S. W. 744. In that case it was held that, under Kirby’s Digest-, § 5856, reserving the control in the State of convicts hired out, a railroad company is not liable for the tortious act of -a State convict in injuring an employee of the riailroad company. In that case the court recognized that the relation of master and servant rests upon a contract of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BoyleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Alfred Watland and Superwood Corporation v. John WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. In Re KrothSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Kroth v. Oklahoma State PenitentiarySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API