Bank of Georgia v. Citizens' Bank
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in the Supreme Court. At February Term, 1881. The facts are sufficiently stated in the head-note.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice'.
Whilst this court has held that where it had considered and decided a cause argued before it, the writ of error would not be allowed to be withdrawn, yet that case had been decided in writing, and the written judgment of the court had been prepared for delivery. In this case nothing of the sort was done — nothing in writing had been agreed upon, and no judgment had been prepared. Therefore the leave is granted,- and the' writ of error is withdrawn, and the judgment below is affirmed.
Indeed, in any case we do not see why, if the application be made before the judgment…
2Cited by3 opinions
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brown Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Styles v. WatersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- McNelis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908