People v. Sapp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Because defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution has not been preserved for our review (see, People v Person, 256 AD2d 1232, lv denied 93 NY2d 856; People v Nesbett, 255 AD2d 950). The plea allocution did not engender significant doubt regarding the voluntariness of the plea to require County Court to conduct a further inquiry (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). By pleading…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. NesbettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. PersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SingletaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000