Legal Opinion

Colonial Manufacturing Co. v. Carideo

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1940No. Appeal, 302PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stadtfeld, J.,

Opinion by

Tbe plaintiff instituted suit in assumpsit to recover tbe sum of $2,110.66 from tbe defendant, representing tbe balance of rentals due under the terms of a written lease agreement between tbe parties. Tbe plaintiff was lessee of tbe premises wbicb consisted of a manufacturing plant in Northampton, Pa., from the Easton Trust Company of Easton, Pa., and sub-let tbe premises to tbe defendant by tbe lease on wbicb suit was brought.

Tbe defendant filed an affidavit of defense admitting liability for tbe rent claim, but relied upon a set-off and counterclaim in tbe total sum…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Martin & Monroe v. BerensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Irvin v. Irvin, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Suraci v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Frederick EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Ziegenfuss v. Ziegenfuss Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Black Et Ux. v. Cinquegrani Ex Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API