Legal Opinion

Redman v. Peirsol

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Monroe Circuit Court. — lion. Thos. H. BacoN, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover the possession of five head of cattle, of the alleged value of one hundred and fifty-five dollars.

The cause was submitted to a jury, and a verdict for the defendant was returned. The court entered final judgment on the verdict, and the plaintiff has appealed.

*174Tbe only matter, of which the plaintiff makes a serious complaint-, has reference to the action of the court in permitting the defendant, on his re-examination, to testify concerning a letter which he had received from one Dirlam. The defendant, in his examination in chief, stated that he bought…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BeatyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Charles v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorn v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Gardner v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Fleishman v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API