Legal Opinion

City of Sugar Creek v. Reese

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1998No. WD 54938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Chief Judge, Presiding Judge.

Edward Reese appeals from the decision of the circuit court concluding that Mr. Reese does not have a constitutional right to alter the nonconforming use of his property located in Sugar Creek, Missouri (“the City”) to another nonconforming use. Mr. Reese raises three issues on appeal. He argues that the circuit court erred by (1) finding that he did not have a vested right to alter the nonconforming use of his property to another nonconforming use; (2) finding that the restriction on his property did not constitute an unconstitutional taking; and (3)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Gold Cross Ambulance & Transfer v. City of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Missouri Rock, Inc. v. WinholtzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Wolfner v. Board of AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. DrewMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Teefey v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Cousin's Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Triangle Fraternity v. City of Norman, Ex Rel. Norman Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. The Lamar Company, LLC v. City of Columbia, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API