Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Finkelstein & Harris

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivern, J.

In this motion by petitioner for stay of arbitration, the basis for the application is that the claim sought to be arbitrated is barred by the Statute of Limitations pursuant to section 1458-a of the Civil Practice Act. The section provides that:

‘ ‘ A motion to compel arbitration shall be denied, and a motion to stay arbitration granted, if at the time of the giving of notice of intention to arbitrate, or of the making of a demand for arbitration, the claim sought to be arbitrated would be barred by an existing statute of limitations if such claim were asserted in an action in a court of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Klein Coat Corp. v. PeretzNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Leigh v. McGuireDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Diesel Construction Co. v. Stewart Tenants Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Johnson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API