Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1995No. Nos. 93-36122, 94-35370PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER.
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. The district court determined that a Second Environmental Impact Statement Supplement (EISS-2), prepared by the Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) in response to our decision in ONRC v. Marsh, 832 F.2d 1489 (9th Cir.1987) (“Marsh II”), rev’d and remanded in part, 490 U.S. 360, 109 S.Ct. 1851, 104 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989), had taken a “hard look” at the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Lathan v. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Environmental Council of Sacramento v. SlaterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2000
- Swanson v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Swanson v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Oregon Natural Resources Council v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.