Legal Opinion

Lofgren v. Pieper Farms

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1995No. C7-95-1618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

Certiorari on the relation of employee, Dale L. Lofgren, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals remanding the matter for further proceedings. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Since 1975, the employee worked as a farmhand for Pieper Farms. On March 27, 1985, he sustained an injury to his right eye when a small fragment of metal entered the eye. He had been holding a piece of metal over an anvil while his employer pounded it with a sledgehammer, attempting to straighten it out. The employee felt a needle-like sensation in the eye, but when…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Kahn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Reese v. Preston Marketing AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Neuberger v. Hennepin County WorkhouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Beson v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  2. Ehlers v. Siemens Medical Solutions, USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API