Lofgren v. Pieper Farms
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
Certiorari on the relation of employee, Dale L. Lofgren, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals remanding the matter for further proceedings. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Since 1975, the employee worked as a farmhand for Pieper Farms. On March 27, 1985, he sustained an injury to his right eye when a small fragment of metal entered the eye. He had been holding a piece of metal over an anvil while his employer pounded it with a sledgehammer, attempting to straighten it out. The employee felt a needle-like sensation in the eye, but when…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Kahn v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Reese v. Preston Marketing AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Neuberger v. Hennepin County WorkhouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Beson v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Ehlers v. Siemens Medical Solutions, USA, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008