Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Eilene Shaffer (Claimant), proceeding pro se, 1 petitions for review of the October 20, 2006, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) affirming the decision of a referee and holding that Claimant was ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law). 2 We affirm.

Claimant was employed by Lenox Collections (Employer) from February 11, 1992, until July 19, 2006, when she resigned from her position as a part-time, inside sales representative. When Claimant began working for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vann v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Groch v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Grosskopf v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Beachem v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Ganter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. Silvers v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. J.R. Gumpher, III v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. M. Normatova v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. S. Rushemeza v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API