Nycum v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*93OPINION
MORSE, Justice.
This consolidated appeal arises out of two convictions for burglary of a habitation wherein the punishment was assessed, pursuant to a guilty plea by the appellant, at twenty-two (22) years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence; therefore, a rendition of the facts is not necessary. We affirm.
In his first ground of error appellant contends that his guilty pleas were “conditional pleas” contingent on his being allowed to appeal his pretrial motions. Appellant asserts that he would not have pled…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whitten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Wooten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Craven v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Killebrew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985