Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Crookston Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1904No. Nos. 13,958—(154)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Red Lake county, Watts, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $225.

1Opinion of the Court

LOVELY, X

Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he was engaged by defendant as an edgerman in its St. Hilaire Mill in Red Lake county for the sawing season of 1903 at specified daily wages; that he commenced work on April 18, and continued until May 1, thereafter, when, by reason of an accident, he became incapacitated, and secured an accepted substitute to fill his place until he recovered, which was on May 20 following, when he reported for duty, but his servic.es were declined, and he was refused employment. In this action he seeks to recover damages for his wrongful discharge. Plaintiff…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Hallada v. Great Northern RailwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Trumbull Asphalt Company of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Cement Masons Local No. 555, Operative Plasterers and Cement Masons International Association, a F LCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  5. Neid v. Tassie's Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API